<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun With Fonts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/</link>
	<description>&#34;Be the change you wish to see in the world.&#34; — Mahatma Gandhi</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 17:05:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Drucker</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-19149</link>
		<dc:creator>David Drucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmurmurs.com/?p=1457#comment-19149</guid>
		<description>Yeah, thanks for the shots. I guess I was so excited to get new fonts that they looked better than I admit they do now. I&#039;ll have to try some others. I guess sans serif choices might turn out better for the body text, since this was supposed to be the best of the serif choices from typekit. I wish they&#039;d open up for everyone so I could show the different types that I tried.

Actually, I had read that serif is still good for body text, both on screen and in print, because the serifs help you distinguish every letter. Can&#039;t remember when and where I read that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, thanks for the shots. I guess I was so excited to get new fonts that they looked better than I admit they do now. I’ll have to try some others. I guess sans serif choices might turn out better for the body text, since this was supposed to be the best of the serif choices from typekit. I wish they’d open up for everyone so I could show the different types that I tried.</p>
<p>Actually, I had read that serif is still good for body text, both on screen and in print, because the serifs help you distinguish every letter. Can’t remember when and where I read that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Karlsbjerg</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-19147</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Karlsbjerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmurmurs.com/?p=1457#comment-19147</guid>
		<description>Correction, the IE8 cutting-off-issue IS dependent on text size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correction, the IE8 cutting-off-issue IS dependent on text size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan Karlsbjerg</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-19146</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan Karlsbjerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 05:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmurmurs.com/?p=1457#comment-19146</guid>
		<description>Yeah, can&#039;t say I&#039;m impressed either. I&#039;ll email you a couple of screenshots.

In IE8, the bottom of the dips are cut off (p, g, y, etc.). This is independent of text size.

Also, I thought the rule of thumb was to use serifs for body text in print, but sans serif for body text on the screen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, can’t say I’m impressed either. I’ll email you a couple of screenshots.</p>
<p>In IE8, the bottom of the dips are cut off (p, g, y, etc.). This is independent of text size.</p>
<p>Also, I thought the rule of thumb was to use serifs for body text in print, but sans serif for body text on the screen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Drucker</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-19143</link>
		<dc:creator>David Drucker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 18:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmurmurs.com/?p=1457#comment-19143</guid>
		<description>Interesting.  What browser are you using? Do you think you could send me a screenshot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting.  What browser are you using? Do you think you could send me a screenshot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cara</title>
		<link>http://www.loudmurmurs.com/2009/08/25/fun-with-fonts/comment-page-1/#comment-19142</link>
		<dc:creator>Cara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.loudmurmurs.com/?p=1457#comment-19142</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it&#039;s my browser but I find the new type face makes the words squished and harder to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it’s my browser but I find the new type face makes the words squished and harder to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

